Nummy, Sparky?
Yes. Nummy, Phil. lol
Canāt give you too much shit. Iām often guilty of really silly phraseology myself. Maybe not on an all adult forum, but stillā¦
I have to balance my tendency towards highly technical somehowā¦ chuckles
And sometimes itās nice just to be ālight and whimsicalā with the slightest air of āI just donāt give a fuckā (because āI care all too muchā the majority of the time. Or so it seems).
Balance, the key to life. I guess you have to find the line between writing a technical manual and ripping off some Suessian banter wherever you can. Whoās a good Sparky? YOUāRE a good Sparky!!!
Dang I need to stay away from the clearance bin.
Seems ok in wattage mode. Havenāt tried TC yet. Nice feel. Fire bar has a little wiggle to it. The screen is really dim even with the brightness on max. Why does anyone used smoked glass on their screens?
Ohhhhh, love the voltrove miniā¦yeah, mini compared to the 41mmā¦Lol. how do u like the MF RDA? Not crazy about that one myself, it is ok but nothing special, just comes in handy when you need a series deck
Yup exactly that. It isnāt terrible but it isnāt stella either. But the price voltrove are selling for atm is stella. They have a few left over that had faulty glass so they are shipping them out with no glass top cap at a little under half price
Holy crap! 8.5 volts on a stick! Get ready cause here it comes!!!
ya is a pretty epic vape - to use @Steampugs words "hits like a drunken uncle " (at least I think it was pugs that used it if he didnāt he should lol)
In guessing itās the same as in the Charon Mini (by release dates).
Iāve already verified that the Cylon and Charon Mini are two completely different firmware.
And given I did a complete strip down on the Charon today (to find the chipset), Iām compelled to go ahead and break out the soldering iron and do the same on a working Cylon.
I canāt stand knowing (and reporting on) one, and not the other. Especially when itās the superior one (Cylon) that I donāt know. lol
Stay tuned!
OK!! Itās official!
They are two WHOLLY different animals!
The Charon Mini operates on a āHoltek HT32F52352ā ARM cpu (generic hunk of shit IMO), and the Cylon (gorgeous workhorse that it is) operates on a ST Microelectronics (long respected name in silicon for decades) STM32F412.
Charon Mini FW version: 1.3.1 (latest and current)
Cylon FW version: 3.0.8 (was on my original Tarnish, as well as the one much later, black)
HUGE difference in why the Cylon is so reliable (as well as the firmware tools/code) IMO.
Other interesting tidbit: My Cylonās (Tarnish) CPU was made in France (āVQā production code). Though there was a revamp to support the hugely popular chipset, and they extended production to their Taiwan Fab as well. So Iām betting that my black oneās cpu was made in Taiwan (though I have not confirmed this yet), and those have an ST production code of ā9Rā.
Even still, I trust ST Micro HEAPS more than I trust the Nuvoton crap, and until Smoant can show that Holtek is capable of stability, theyāre not much above Nuvoton IMcurrentO.
Since theyāre both the same form factorā¦(32F series, and 64pin)
Iāve got a sneaking suspicion that I could drop an ST chip in the Charon Mini, and with a bit of firmware finagling, could have another stable device! (but of course have to account for the difference in screen size, after finding a way to do a factory dump of the Cylonās FW.)
Interesting, yet random thoughts aboundā¦ grinning
Makes me more curious whatās inside the Naboo.
Makes me think theyāre not doing their own thing (as I initially hoped) but are job-batching models (or even order runs) through different assembly houses, As each product is designed (and even possibly, as reordered).
Reasons for suspicions/questioning:
- Different chip use from one product to another. (Holtek on the Charon Mini, ST on the Cylon)
- Level of care/attention to detail during the assembly process (small things like glue around the lcd mounting on the Cylon, but not the Charon Mini)
- Different lcd screens within the same product line (solid black backlighting on the Tarnish, blue tint on Black Cylon, obtained 6-8 months later)
And, thereās also the extreme outlying chance that I received a clone (Charon Mini), but I find that EXTREMELY unlikely. Iām more inclined to believe itās a small team of devs/designers, batching jobs outā¦
Even though theyāre obviously not making their own chips (as weād previously been led to believe: the ANT versions) I do appreciate that they are currently ātelling usā when they switch sources, and what chip is in which one (even though we need someone to translate what that actually āmeansā):
Ant 225 = Holtek
Ant 218 = ST Microelectronics
At least they arenāt obscuring the data by lasering off the top of the chip!
@Eddie
Given the product page says itās the 225 chipā¦
http://smoant.com/naboo-kit-225w/index.html
Iād bet itās the Holtek.
But thatās just an educated guess.